[87224] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: The topic marker -'e'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Trimboli)
Thu Nov 26 19:57:53 2009
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:56:07 -0500
From: David Trimboli <david@trimboli.name>
In-reply-to: <4b0f2239.e701be0a.28fb.3766@mx.google.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Christopher Doty wrote:
> But I disagree. A noun with -vaD followed by a another noun is never
> a single noun phrase, and I don't think any of the cases where I used
> it could it be construed as such. Because in a n-n phrase, the first
> noun can't have any suffixes....
Good! So let's hear another sentence using {-vaD} and see where we're
at. And remember, "N1 for the N2" is an illegal noun-noun phrase.
--
SuStel
tlhIngan Hol MUSH
http://trimboli.name/mush
