[87166] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: frasier Klingon
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI')
Wed Nov 25 18:21:48 2009
In-Reply-To: <8CC3C24E8006889-62C0-25BE5@webmail-m083.sysops.aol.com>
From: "ghunchu'wI'" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:20:40 -0500
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On Nov 25, 2009, at 3:27 PM, rklingonwarrior@aol.com wrote:
> My friend phoenetically copied it as;
> Pookh lod wih le koo. Hach jahj cho-koov-moakh leng-lidge loo-Teb-
> jahj leng widge-vahd bel rahp shoave dah-nobe-poo- boagh.
That matches what was spoken, if you don't recognize the attempted
"familiar phonetic" spelling. Grammer apparently saw "pookh" and
pronounced each individual vowel in isolation; instead of {puq} it
came out closer to {po'oq}. "le koo" ended up as {le qo'o} instead
of {le'qu'}; "shoave" became approximately {Sowav} instead of the
intended {Sov}.
That's all I can add to Voragh's response.
-- ghunchu'wI'
