[87105] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: pu'jIn
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lieven Litaer)
Wed Nov 25 02:13:40 2009
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:10:48 +0100
From: "Lieven Litaer" <levinius@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <a1173fff0911241624u47a5e424u11df9de66090cec6@mail.gmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
I don't join the noun-noun-discussion now.
Talking about {pu'jIn chenmoHwI'} and the like, I like to show what it could mean, and therefore misunderstood:
At least here in Germany, the architect develops the building. Then there is a drawer, how draws the plan for it. And this computerdrawing is sent to a company that prints the "drawing on paper", which is the {pu'jIn}.
Now, who's the {pu'jIn chenmoHwI'}?
And about making words, anyway:
Yes, we are allowed to make compound words. But we *agreed* to not use them, unless they are clear in context. In that case, they still would not be the official word for a thing.
You wouldn't do this in english or any other language either.
Quvar.
--
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 -
sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atbrowser
