[87012] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: The topic marker -'e'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI')
Mon Nov 23 19:30:41 2009
In-Reply-To: <6038b7230911231607m3fde7287qd6b5d9859d783e93@mail.gmail.com>
From: "ghunchu'wI'" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:29:22 -0500
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On Nov 23, 2009, at 7:07 PM, André Müller wrote:
> 2009/11/23 Christopher Doty <suomichris@gmail.com>
>> This is kind of a silly argument, though, because Okrand's work
>> doesn't outline ungrammatical possibilities, it outlines grammatical
>> possibilities...
>>
> Okrand's work doesn't outline ungrammatical possibilities, this
> means that
> we cannot be sure if a sentence is ungrammatical, unless we're told
> so by
> Himself.
peqIm! _qIb lengwI' tlhIngan Hol_ bolaDnISqu'! pabHa'bogh mu'mey
Delbej.
-- ghunchu'wI'
