[86833] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Yet another newbie!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tracy Canfield)
Thu Nov 12 11:00:32 2009
In-Reply-To: <6038b7230911120751i26a73a15y48286d659f368639@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:56:46 -0500
From: Tracy Canfield <toastrix@gmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
You're quite right - I misread it after too much time staring at something else.
2009/11/12 André Müller <esperantist@gmail.com>:
> But 'e' is a pronoun in this sentence, not the type 5 suffix -'e'. They just
> happen to be homophonous.
> Greetings,
> - André
>
> 2009/11/12 Tracy Canfield <toastrix@gmail.com>
>
>> 2009/11/12 Terrence Donnelly <terrence.donnelly@sbcglobal.net>:
>> > --- On Thu, 11/12/09, kff@sics.se <kff@sics.se> wrote:
>> >
>> >> {jIHvaD De' Danobta' 'e'vaD qatlho'}
>> >>
>>
>> te'reS has already rephrased the sentence, so I just wanted to chime
>> in that -'e' and -vaD are both Type 5 suffixes, and you can't use two
>> suffixes of the same type at the same time.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
