[86643] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: The meaning of -moH
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com)
Thu Oct 8 11:17:53 2009
From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 11:16:31 EDT
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
In a message dated 10/8/2009 08:14:55 Eastern Daylight Time,
qunchuy@alcaco.net writes:
> When introducing verb prefixes, the example
> verb is {Qong} "sleep" and only the no-object prefixes are listed.
> The text then goes on to say that those prefixes are also used when
> an object is possible but not stated. I infer from the wording that
> such prefixes are *not* used with {Qong}.
mumISmoH mu'tlheghmeylIj.
First you say only no-object prefixes are used with {Qong}, then you say
such prefixes are *not* used with {Qong}.
lay'tel SIvten
