[86603] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: na'ran rur [Re: Klingon WOTD: na' (verb)]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Trimboli)
Wed Sep 30 17:59:54 2009
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:57:02 -0400
From: David Trimboli <david@trimboli.name>
In-reply-to: <27a7b7f70909301341s6f1554aao4cd0cc493a4f1378@mail.gmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
qurgh lungqIj wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:26 PM, David Trimboli <david@trimboli.name> wrote:
>> na'ran rurbogh Soj luSop tera'ngan 'e' lutIv.
>>
> Should there be an -'e' on Soj to mark is as the head noun of the -bogh
> clause or is that optional?
>
> na'ran rurbogh Soj'e' luSop tera'ngan 'e' lutIv.
It's optional. Given that {na'ran rur} is a recognized clause with a
specific meaning, there isn't really any confusion as to what the
sentence means.
--
SuStel
tlhIngan Hol MUSH
http://trimboli.name/mush
