[86425] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Query on -choHmoHwI'
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (qe'San \(Jon Brown\))
Sun Aug 16 08:07:33 2009
From: "qe'San \(Jon Brown\)" <qeSan@btinternet.com>
To: "KLI Mailing List" <tlhIngan-Hol@kli.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:05:57 +0100
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Boozer" <sboozer@uchicago.edu>
> Mark J. Reed wrote:
>>You can certainly attach -wI' to the verb to get "cleaner". Whether
>>that's understood to mean "toothbrush" depends on context.
>
> naHQun:
>>I thought he meant toothpaste...
>
> ... or a dental hygienist!
I was thinking toothbrush but I accept without any further clarification it
could be open to brush or hygegienist but context like me being in my
bathroom or being at the dentist's would differentiate...
I suppose toothpaste could be included but where a hygienist or tooth brush
could clean the teeth without anything else toothpaste would require
something like the toothbrush, finger or hygienist to get rid of any dirt.
Shame there isn't a word for paste (at least one I'm aware of)... I wonder
if "thick solution" {taS jeD} would adequately describe a paste. If so
maybe Ho'Du' taS jeD would pass as toothpaste
"In order to clean my teeth. I use tooth brush (cleaner) and paste."
Ho'Du'wIj vIlamHa'choHmoHmeH lamHa'choHmoHwI' Ho'Du' taS jeD je vIlo'
or if that works would thick solution on it's own be enough:
Ho'Du'wIj vIlamHa'choHmoHmeH lamHa'choHmoHwI' taS jeD je vIlo'
??
qe'San