[86236] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Questions with law'/puS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Trimboli)
Thu Jul 9 17:53:53 2009
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:49:26 -0400
From: David Trimboli <david@trimboli.name>
In-reply-to: <818369.77506.qm@web82603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Terrence Donnelly wrote:
> --- On Thu, 7/9/09, David Trimboli <david@trimboli.name> wrote:
>> It was in KGT, where Okrand is telling us about special exceptions
>> to the usual law'/puS construction. law'be'/puSbe' is a specially
>> sanctioned formation, and not evidence of a general trend of using
>> verb suffixes.
>
> Did he come out and say in KGT that there are no other allowable
> suffixes?
Nope.
>> It's special. It can't be interpolated or expanded. It must remain
>> fixed. Period. Done. Game, set, and match. rIntaH.
>
> Absence of evidence /= evidence of absence.
I didn't claim there was any evidence.
--
SuStel
tlhIngan Hol MUSH
http://trimboli.name/mush
