[86071] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Klingon translation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com)
Sat Jun 27 18:31:03 2009
From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:29:26 EDT
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
In a message dated 6/27/2009 18:19:55 Eastern Daylight Time,
doq@embarqmail.com writes:
> While I like using the suffix {-'e'} to mark the head noun that links
> the relative clause and the main clause, Okrand has rarely used it,
> and in this particular case, since there is only one noun in the
> relative clause, it doesn't really need to be marked.
>
> What you've written is definitely not wrong. It's just putting an
> unusual quantity of focus on {nuHvetlh}.
>
> Doq
>
Good point. Like I said, I should have just read the whole post before
jumping in.
lay'tel SIvten
