[85984] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Klingon orthography
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI' 'utlh)
Thu Jun 25 16:47:33 2009
In-Reply-To: <9C4FA670-6B5D-45CF-94B2-2A99B725FF38@evertype.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:45:45 -0400
From: "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Michael Everson<everson@evertype.com> wrote:
> On 25 Jun 2009, at 20:49, ghunchu'wI' 'utlh wrote:
>
>> vaj chIch jIHvaD jabbI'IDmey chIm DangeHta''a'?
>
> No. I sent the message intentionally, not by a slip of the finger on
> the keyboard. That it had an incomplete sentence was inadvertent.
mu'tlhegh naQHa' lungaSbe' wej jabbI'IDmey DangeHbogh.
mu'tlhegh naQ lungaSbe'. pagh'e' lungaS. chImqu' bIH.
vIwoDta'mo' vI'anglaHbe', 'ach tlhegh veb rur:
yaj'a'?
>> qatlh bIvIDtaH?
>
> I'm not.
Daqapchugh, qaHarqang.
toH, chaq bong DangeHpu', 'ej DangeHpu' 'e' DaSovbe'.
-- ghunchu'wI'
