[85850] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Klingon orthography (was: Okrand at qep'a')
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com)
Wed Jun 24 00:11:28 2009
From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:10:35 EDT
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
In a message dated 6/23/2009 22:11:50 Eastern Daylight Time, mark@kli.org
writes:
> The ambiguities introduced by folding q/Q are not
> trivial, or we wouldn't bother distinguishing them in the first place.
> There does not appear to be any reason within the language to consider
> the two phonemes to be related lexically.
>
That's a good point.
lay'tel SIvten
