[85739] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: pIqaD origins
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark J. Reed)
Mon Jun 15 16:25:25 2009
In-Reply-To: <4a3692a5.47c2f10a.2b84.0b06@mx.google.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:23:17 -0400
From: "Mark J. Reed" <markjreed@gmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Probably a better assumption, yes. :)
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Michael Roney, Jr.<nahqun@gmail.com> wrote:
> I assumed he meant TMP.
> -naHQun
>
> -Michael Roney, Jr.
> http://twitter.com/roneyii
>
> --Sent from my Palm PreMark J. Reed wrote:
>
> Well, it's wrong about the identity of the movie - there were no
> Klingons in Star Trek II. Assuming it was really III, though, it does
> sound like the origin of the onscreen Klingon script that was the
> inspiration for the KLI's pIqaDqoq.
>
> On 6/15/09, Terrence Donnelly wrote:
>>
>> My son found this link:
>>
>> http://jules.dailygrommet.com/2009/05/21/objectified/#comment-779
>>
>> talking about the origins of the Klingon font used in STII. Is this
>> something we already knew? Is this the same as the pIqaD we all know and
>> love?
>>
>> -- ter'eS
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Sent from my mobile device
>
> Mark J. Reed
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@gmail.com>
