[85574] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: chay' chIjmeH tlhuDtaHbogh Hovmey DIlo'laH?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brent Kesler)
Thu May 28 16:50:33 2009
In-Reply-To: <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A69244BF47F9@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:47:53 -0700
From: Brent Kesler <brent.of.all.people@gmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu> wrote:
>
> For the astronomy buffs... Lacking a word for pulsar I came up with {tlhuDtaHbogh Hov} "star which
> continuously emits (energy/radiation)" on the model of {Dejpu'bogh Hov} "collapsed star". Right or
> wrong?
My first reaction was "What star doesn't emit radiation?"
I took a quick look at Wikipedia. Pulsars emit beams of radiation at
predictable intervals (ie, pulses). Maybe {tIH bachbogh Hov}? Does
{tIH bachqa'taHbogh Hov} suggested repeated intervals?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulsar
bI'reng
