[85570] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: nuq bach?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Trimboli)
Thu May 28 08:35:51 2009
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:34:19 -0400
From: David Trimboli <david@trimboli.name>
In-reply-to: <BAY127-W9836385CBE2C1142FBC23AA500@phx.gbl>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Rohan F wrote:
> the indirect object of {bach} should also probably be marked with {-Daq},
> and that's what turns up on S14:
>
> ...ray' HopDaq bachlu'meH chuqna' ghurmoH naQvam
> "This [stock] serves to ... increase the effective range for distance
> targeting." (S14)
Pretty conclusive right there!
--
David Trimboli
http://www.trimboli.name/
