[85565] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: nuq bach?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brent Kesler)
Thu May 28 03:22:41 2009
In-Reply-To: <C305E6BD33E2654DAE1F8F403247B6A6924378ED93@EVS02.ad.uchicago.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 00:20:40 -0700
From: Brent Kesler <brent.of.all.people@gmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu> wrote:
>
> If you don't like the latter, you can use {ngu'} and say:
>
> DoSDaq bachchu'bogh yaS yIngu'
> "Identify the target at which the officer shot!")
>
> But since you can't use two Type 5 suffixes - i.e. *{DoSDaq'e'} - this is still ambiguous as it could
> possibly mean "Identify the officer who shot at the target!"
Epiphany: Use {-meH}. It's clean and clear.
'Iv qIpmeH bach yaS?
'Iv HoHmeH bach yaS?
bI'reng
