[85558] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: nuq bach?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ghunchu'wI')
Wed May 27 21:45:51 2009
In-Reply-To: <f5b478ef0905271801p24d197b5qb8af1ec32bccb133@mail.gmail.com>
From: "ghunchu'wI'" <qunchuy@alcaco.net>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:44:36 -0400
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On May 27, 2009, at 9:01 PM, qa'vaj wrote:
> {-vaD} also marks the indirect object.
I opine differently. What I recall TKD's addendum saying is that the
recipient of a gift may be considered the indirect object. I do not
consider someone being shot to be the same sort of thing. In my
mind, the target is a location, not a beneficiary.
-- ghunchu'wI'
