[85465] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Klingon Ad for my new novel!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brent Kesler)
Sun May 17 20:04:19 2009
In-Reply-To: <E8B673D0-3D7B-4EAE-933D-17DE3637DC1F@alcaco.net>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 17:00:52 -0700
From: Brent Kesler <brent.of.all.people@gmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:54 PM, ghunchu'wI' <qunchuy@alcaco.net> wrote:
>
> That canon (Skybox card S26) also presents a N-N-N-N-N construction
> that would likely give Lawrence fits.
>
> DuraS tuq tlhIngan yejquv patlh luDub...
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'
Personally, I've never minded N to the nth constructions. It only gets
difficult to parse when you nouns that are also verbs and verbs that
are also adjectivials.
bI'reng
