[85] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Intensive Klingon I
dcctdw@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (dcctdw@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Sun Feb 16 15:22:12 1992
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
From: cbmvax!snark.thyrsus.com!cowan@uunet.UU.NET (John Cowan)
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 92 13:01:09 EST
In-Reply-To: <9112261809.AA29484@hodge>; from "Athena.MIT.EDU!dcctdw" at Dec 26
Dave Cho writes:
> 2) With officers, the mapping is to English names, so i assume that they
> are using the English hierarchy:
[details omitted]
I would presume rather the >Starfleet< hierarchy: ensign, lieutenant,
lieutenant commander, commander, captain, commodore, admiral. Starfleet
doesn't make distinctions as fine as USN or RN.
The Empire might not even have a rank corresponding to LCDR.
--
cowan@snark.thyrsus.com ...!uunet!cbmvax!snark!cowan
e'osai ko sarji la lojban
