[84938] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: idea for writing system

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lawrence John Rogers)
Mon Aug 4 15:55:19 2008

In-Reply-To: <EFC65966-C90B-4E1E-AD13-457C36CE8F05@alcaco.net>
From: "Lawrence John Rogers" <roger158@msu.edu>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 07:04:38 -0400
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org

qa-ghItlh QaH 

cho‘oy’ 

qalajbe’ 

ghopji bIlegh 

Hab SoSlI Quch 

 

ghunchu'wI' writes: 

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> 
 

ghunchu'wI' writes: 

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
>  
> 

ghunchu'wI' writes: 

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> ghunchu'wI' writes:

> ja' Lawrence John Rogers: 
> 
>> I'd be taking the characters of the gobbldy-gook and creating a  
>> writing system out of it.
> 
> qatlh?  pIqaDna' 'oH pat'e' Da'oghbogh 'e' Daghet DaneH'a'? 
> 
> Why?  Do you plan to present your system as "the" Klingon system? 
> 
> naDev tlhIngan Hol wIHaD neH.  wI'oghbe'.  wIlo'.
> qech DI'ogh.  mu'tlhegh DI'ogh.  lut DI'ogh.  bom DI'ogh.
> 'ach patmey lo'bogh tlhInganpu' wI'oghlaHbe' maH. 
> 
> We just study Klingon here.  We don't invent it.  We use it.
> Ideas, sentences, stories, songs -- these we invent.
> But *we* can't invent systems used by Klingons. 
> 
> rut pIqaDqoq wIlo'.  mungDaj wISovchu'be'.  pIqaDna' 'oH 'e' neH  
> wISov.  'IHchoHmeH ghItlhmeymaj 'ej DajchoHmeH 'oH wIlo'.  tlhIngan  
> DIDachu' 'e' QaHbe'. 
> 
> The origin of the "pIqaD" that we use on occasion is obscure.  All we  
> know is that it's not "really" the Klingon writing system.  We use it  
> as an artistic conceit rather than as an attempt to be more  
> authentically Klingon. 
> 
> -- ghunchu'wI' 'utlh 
> 
> 
 





home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post