[84286] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Klingon WOTD: nIHwI' (noun)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven Boozer)
Tue Mar 25 11:24:09 2008

Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:21:30 -0500
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
From: Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu>
In-Reply-To: <f60fe000803240900u50317e73p839054fc9b2c66e@mail.gmail.com>
  <c40.2fdba662.3519dfe8@wmconnect.com>
  <E460D4DA-3B9C-402D-A084-6A1D456E476E@insightbb.com>
  <E1Je3Yk-00036N-QN@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org

Voragh:
> > This is of course the nomen agentis of the verb {nIH} "steal".
> > Related verbs include {Hej} "rob" and {qor} "scavenge".

Mark J. Reed:
>Do we have any canonical help with the distinction between {nIH} and
>{Hej}?   The difference between the English glosses is pretty darn
>subtle, if not nonexistent, depending on context.

Our only example of {nIH} "steal" comes from a brief example on the Star 
Trek Continuum: LKlingon Linguistic Studies page:

   DanIH
   You steal it. KLS

Note the English object "it".

AFAIK there are no examples of {Hej} "rob", though {HejwI'} "robber" was 
mentioned in KGT in the section on the importance of correct enunciation 
(p. 191):

    Hej ("rob") / HIj ("deliver, transport goods")

      {HejwI'} ("robber")
      {HIjwI'} ("delivery person")

Hmm... nice contrast:  a {HejwI'} takes things away from you, but a 
{HIjwI'} brings things to you! <g>

lay'tel SIvten:
>I don't see any canon usage at all for either {nIH} or {Hej}, but the English
>difference between "steal" and "rob" mirrors the difference between {jatlh}
>and {ja'}.
>
>In "A robs B", A takes something from B, while in "A steals B", A takes B
>from someone.

I think this is a good rule-of-thumb to follow until we have more 
examples.  This distinction (in English) is even illustrated by Okrand's 
comment about the Hur'q:

   ... the Hur'q, a race of humanoids from the Gamma Quadrant who
   developed a reputation as ruthless invaders who would attack other
   societies primarily for the purpose of robbery, stealing whatever
   they could and destroying the rest.  [KGT 153]

i.e. {nugh luHej} they rob a "society" (i.e. people) vs. {vay' lunIH} they 
steal "whatever" (i.e. things).

Jonathan Webley:
>Is {nIH} a pun on "nick"?

That's been suggested, but I don't know if Okrand has ever confirmed it.




--
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post