[83970] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Missing question words

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven Boozer)
Mon Jan 14 16:54:12 2008

Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:52:15 -0600
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
From: Steven Boozer <sboozer@uchicago.edu>
In-Reply-To: <83603E37-B57A-4612-A955-71B9E155A9C0@embarqmail.com>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org

Dow wrote:
>I'm not sure that a Klingon would ask "How happy are you?" It's just a
>hunch, but I think there would always be a sense of mission behind
>such a question. A better example might be the "How loyal is the
>captain?":
>
>   matlh HoD net Sov. Qu'vaD yap'a'?
>
>Basically, "Is the captain loyal enough for the mission?"

You've phrased it as a yes/no question, not a quantifiable one.   As such, 
this can be simpler:

   Qu'vaD matlh'a' HoD?

{Qu'vaD} limits "be loyal" to a particular mission, and therefore implies 
"loyal enough":

   The noun {Qu'vaD} means "for the mission", and in this sentence {-vaD}
   indicates that the information is intended to be used somehow for the
   mission under discussion.  (TKD 28f.)

   Qu'vaD lI' De'vam
   This information is useful for the mission. TKD

   Qu'vaD lI' net tu'bej
   One certainly finds it useful for the mission.
   One will certainly observe that it is useful to the mission. TKD

   Qu'vaD wa' DevwI' tu'lu'
   For one mission, there is one leader. TKW

Of course, the real question you're asking is {Qu'vaD HoD wIvoqlaH'a'} "Can 
we trust the captain for the mission?"  Another yes/no question:  Yes, we 
send him on the mission; no, we kill him.  <g>





--
Voragh
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post