[83967] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Missing question words

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Doq)
Mon Jan 14 16:10:42 2008

From: Doq <doq@embarqmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
In-Reply-To: <478BB1BF.4090709@trimboli.name>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:08:45 -0500
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org

Another angle on this:

I'm not sure that a Klingon would ask "How happy are you?" It's just a  
hunch, but I think there would always be a sense of mission behind  
such a question. A better example might be the "How loyal is the  
captain?":

matlh HoD net Sov. Qu'vaD yap'a'?

Basically, "Is the captain loyal enough for the mission?"

For these things that don't have a numerical measurement, I think you  
need a threshold set. Something like:

HoD: {bIQuch'a' pagh bIQuchqu''a'?}

SuvwI': {jIQuchqu', qaH!}

HoD: {toH! bIQuchqu''a' pagh bIQuchchu''a'?}

SuvwI': {jagh vIHoHta'mo' jIQuchchu', qaH!}

HoD: {majQa'!}

Doq

On Jan 14, 2008, at 2:02 PM, David Trimboli wrote:

> Elizabeth Lawrence wrote:
>> I would simply rephrase as a command.
>>
>> bIQuch 'e' yIDel
>>
>> 'IH ghaH 'e' yIDel
>>
>> matlh HoD 'e' yIDel
>
> I think the imperative is a good way to go about this, but I don't  
> think
> you've got it quite right.
>
>    Describe that you are happy!
>    Describe that he is handsome!
>    Describe that the captain is loyal!
>
> I'd go for something more like this:
>
>    QuchtaHghachlIj yIDel
>    Describe your continued happiness!
>
>    'IHchu'ghachDaj yIDel
>    Describe his perfect beauty!
>
>    HoD matlhbejghach yIDel
>    Describe the captain's unquestionable loyalty!
>
> Of course, the trouble here is that we don't have ready-to-use nouns  
> for
> these states, so we have to improvise with {-ghach}, and doing so  
> always
> requires some descriptor beyond just the quality itself. You can't  
> have
> just "happiness," you have to have "continued happiness" or "resumed
> happiness" or "unhappiness" or something.
>
> On the other hand, by arranging the question this way, you risk not
> receiving a "quantitative" response to "how happy" and so on. You  
> might
> instead hear about WHY the person is happy.
>
>    QuchtaHghachlIj yIDel!
>
>    ta' gheSpu'DI' qeylIS, batlh SuvchoH yo' vIra'bogh. romuluSngan  
> law'
>    DIHoH rIntaH. qutluch patlh DotlhwIj vIDub...
>
>    mevyap! bIQuchqu''a'?
>
>    ... HIja'...
>
> SuStel
> Stardate 8037.7
>
> -- 
> Practice the Klingon language on the tlhIngan Hol MUSH.
> http://trimboli.name/klingon/mush.html
>
>




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post