[83766] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: The Art of War: title
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (naHQun)
Sat Dec 29 14:48:25 2007
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 14:46:01 -0500
From: naHQun <nahqun@gmail.com>
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
In-Reply-To: <BLU115-F12803C7E95D5140BDC18DDF2560@phx.gbl>
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
DuH jav vImaS.
~naHQun
On 12/29/07, Agnieszka Solska <agnpau1@hotmail.com> wrote:
snip
> Also close to the Chinese title.
>
> 6. {veS mIw}, i.e. "Warfare Procedure(s)":
>
> The option I like best. It not only captures the meaning of the Chinese
> title but actually mirrors its structure. Of course, the same could be said
> about {QI' mIw} but the noun {veS} has a broader meaning than {QI'} and thus
> seems a better equivalent of the polysemous BING.
>
>
> 'ISqu'
>
--
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=508314975
http://www.myspace.com/naHQun
http://www.angelfire.com/tx4/purpleelaphants/
Modern playwrights have become obsessed with writing human
interpretations of alien theatrical works while ignoring completely
our own unique cultural heritage.~Bashir; "The Die is Cast" (DS9)
