[83745] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: "to-be" + <<-bogh>>
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alan Anderson)
Wed Dec 26 11:30:18 2007
In-Reply-To: <f5b478ef0712252316m1afbf8d2i9fc823dc0f1aebe8@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alan Anderson <aranders@insightbb.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 11:27:07 -0500
To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-to: tlhingan-hol-bounce@kli.org
Reply-to: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
ja' qa'vaj:
> I always saw {naDev} as the noun being modified by the relative
> clause (to
> use your terminology).
It's TKD's terminology, not mine.
-- ghunchu'wI'
