[812] in tlhIngan-Hol
additions to Klingon? (was Re: Two Exciting Announcemen
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Wed May 12 01:25:33 1993
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
From: erich@bush.cs.tamu.edu (Erich Schneider)
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
Date: Tue, 11 May 93 14:08:11 CDT
In-Reply-To: A.APPLEYARD@fs1.mt.umist.ac.uk's message of 11 May 93 10:25:50 GMT
ghItlh A.APPLEYARD: (tlhIngan pong Daghaj'a'?)
> What about "therefore", "with the (perhaps unintended) result that"?
>This is distinct from purpose clauses (-meH).
Why not use "vaj"? It seems to have the right meaning.
As a Klingon might paraphrase Descartes:
"jIQub vaj jIH." (although they would probably say "jISuv vaj jIH." {{:-)
Qapla'!
-'avrIn
