[527] in tlhIngan-Hol
-ghach
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Fri Apr 9 03:34:14 1993
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
From: Captain Krankor <krankor@codex.prds.cdx.mot.com>
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 93 23:09:19 -0400
I'm trying to get caught up on the list (I'm about 22 messages behind), so I'm
sure I'm not going to address everything I should or would like to, but I'll
try to at least pop a few off.
trI'Qal asked about the troublesome -ghach. We've discussed this here some
before, but I'll just briefly summerize my take on it:
1) It doesn't actually say you CAN'T put -ghach on a simple (suffix-less) verb,
and we don't really have any examples of other suffixes being restricted on the
type of verbs they can go on, so it would appear that, yes, you can put -ghach
on any simple verb.
2) It also says that many simple verbs have the identical word as the noun form
