[3765] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: How to speak of existence?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Fri Mar 11 01:42:36 1994
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
From: Captain Krankor <krankor@codex.prds.cdx.mot.com>
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 94 23:37:02 -0700
Ok, simple short answer:
1) tu'lu' is actually given in the section on -lu'. 4.2.5, page 39.
2) You are right that "pagh lalDan" is lacks a verb, is not a sentence,
and is just a sentence fragment. BUT: Check the original English.
"No Religion" isn't a sentence either.
3) General questions about how to talk about existance are likely to
generate lengthy discussion (as they have in the past). The simple answer
is: there's no obvious, clear-cut way to do it, per se.
--Krankor
