[3725] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Noun-Noun Construction

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Wed Mar 9 17:00:29 1994

Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
From: Will Martin <whm2m@uva.pcmail.virginia.edu>
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 94 17:29:45 EST


> >     I think there is a pretty strong case for using it adjectivally, so
> >long
> >as it is used without the Type 5 noun suffix.
> >
> >charghwI'
> 
> Since when do we consider something an adjectival only if it tacks on a
> type
> 5 suffix. 

     You've completely missed my point. The word was WITHOUT. TKD says that
you cannot use any suffix except {-qu'} on a verb being used adjectivally IF
THE VERB HAS A TYPE 5 NOUN SUFFIX, which it gets if it follows a noun that
would logically receive that Type 5 suffix.

> Sure, if you do that, the fact that it is an adjectival will be
> unquestionable, but we shouldn't say "Now remember, we think that {HeghmoH}
> might be used as an adjectival, but if you use it that way, be sure to tack
> on some type 5 suffix, so we know that's how you're using it." 

     Excuse me, but I think you are reading this part of my posts about as
accurately as you've been reading a lot of other things I've written lately,
which does not serve communication very well.

> NO! My
> assumption is that if you have to add some petty marker to clarify that 
> it's
> an adjective, then it might as well not even be an adjective.

     My, but we continue with our completely misinterpreted argument...

> 
> Elsewhere in TKD, and on the tapes, there is the strong implication that
the
> only suffixes that can be tacked onto adjectivals are rovers like {-qu'} or
> {-be'} or {-Ha'} (tho probably not {-Qo'}, mainly for semantic reasons, tho
> the case is easily debated).
> 
> 
> Guido#1, Leader of All Guidos

     Umm. You might want to just calm down and read TKD on adjectivals
again..

charghwI'


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post