[3531] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: KLBC "Parrot"

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Wed Mar 2 12:39:44 1994

Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
From: mark <mark@dragonsys.COM>
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 94 11:57:35 EST


qorvo':
     *    *    *

----- When I parsed out that last sentence I got;

jatlhlaHlaw'bogh : which is seemingly able to speak
Ha'DIbaH	 : animal
'oH		 : it (pronoun)
Sajvam'e'	 : this Pet (Topic)

I beleive this translates to "This pet is an animal which is seemingly
able to speak."  If I got that right,  why is the pronoun 'oH needed here?

Why not;  jatlhlaHlaw' Ha'DIbah Sajvam'e'

     *    *    *
Because of the way Klingon constructs copulative sentences.
(Wipe that snicker off your face, and look it up in your Funk &
Wagnall's!)  See TKD 6.3, pp. 67-68.

OTOH, on the assumption that a Saj has to be a Ha'DIbaH, you
could just say
     jatlhlaHlaw' Sajvam
and be done with it.

- marqem

                         Mark A. Mandel 
    Dragon Systems, Inc. : speech recognition : +1 617 965-5200 
  320 Nevada St. :  Newton, Mass. 02160, USA : mark@dragonsys.com


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post