[3427] in tlhIngan-Hol
KLBC-DrujIv's comments
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Thu Feb 24 09:27:35 1994
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
From: "Matt Gomes" <m_gomes@macsmtp.kla.com>
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Date: 24 Feb 1994 06:24:04 -0800
Reply to: KLBC-DrujIv's comments
jatlhqu' DrujIv:
> Could we decide on a uniform teacher? A uniform style? A REASONABLY
> uniform level of ease/difficulty (going from "tlhIngan jIH" to the long
> sentence that chargwI', albeit ably, explained is very confusing also.)?
I agree with you. I think the grammarians/Lawrence/the powers that
be should choose ONE person to correct (it shouldn't be THAT difficult).
And if that one person gets overwhelmed, then that person should
draft someone to help.
What I don't agree with is drawing any kind of line in regards to ease
or difficulty. My level of understanding is different than yours. Although
we are both beginners, we are different levels of beginners and need to
practice/be corrected/learn at our own levels. (IMESHO)
> DrujIv
-mat
