[340] in tlhIngan-Hol
Klingon negative and wa'.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Tue May 19 17:24:30 1992
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@village.boston.ma.us
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
From: Mark E. Shoulson <shoulson@ctr.columbia.edu>
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
Date: Tue, 19 May 92 16:11:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: Michael Everson's message of Tue, 19 May 92 18:21:57 GMT <92051917
Ack. It's been pointed out that we have no word for "anybody" in the
dictionary, so double-negs-as-positives is pretty much moot, since we don't
have a good way to get a negative without allowing doubles as negatives.
I'd still rather hear from from the pabpo''a' about this. I spoke without
looking at the available lexicon. Then again, just because we don't have
one doesn't mean there isn't one. Ah, the hassles of not having an
informant!
~mark
