[3387] in tlhIngan-Hol
TLBC: QelHo' vISuch
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Mon Feb 21 19:01:55 1994
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
From: shoulson@ctr.columbia.edu (Mark E. Shoulson)
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 1994 18:52:09 -0500
In-Reply-To: Will Martin's message of Mon, 21 Feb 94 13:18:46 EST <9402211819.A
A17250@uva.pcmail.Virginia.EDU>
>From: Will Martin <whm2m@uva.pcmail.virginia.edu>
>Date: Mon, 21 Feb 94 13:18:46 EST
>Matthew Whiteacre wrote and charghwI' responds:
>> Subject: TLBC: QelHo' vISuch
>>
>> wejleS QelHo' vISuch
>Am I the only person who would have expected {Ho'Qel} instead of
>{QelHo'}? Perhaps it makes no difference? {Ho'Qel DaSuchtaHvIS bIDo'jaj}
No (you're not). I agree with you; Ho'Qel makes more sense: a tooth['s]
doctor.
~mark
