[3352] in tlhIngan-Hol
RE: Beginner Standard
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Fri Feb 18 12:30:18 1994
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
From: "...Paul" <cleggp@rpi.edu>
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 1994 12:16:55 -0500
>From: Jeremy Cowan <ujcowan@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu>
>Date: Thu, 17 Feb 1994 22:46:42 -0600 (CST)
>Subject: RE: Beginner Standard
>
>>From: Captain Krankor
>
>>>2) Let us put the keyboard *BEGINNER* at the beginning of all
>>>such posts. This is to remind more advanced people who read and
>>>reply to such posts to tone down and keep it simple. (In
>>>particular, it is a reminder for *me*, since I intend to read and
>>>participate in the beginner conversation). The subject header is
>>>probably insufficient for this, since, there are people (myself,
>>>at least) who just look at everything that goes by.
>
>>I like this idea. However, I think "BEGINNER" is too long a word;
>>maybe BGNR? BEGIN? chu'wI'? Something that doesn't take up the
>>whole Subject field... :)
>
>Paul,
> I do believe the good captain was referring to putting the word
>*BEGINNER* at the beginning of the message itself. He specifically
>mentioned that the subject header was not good enough. The subject
>would still be KLBC or whatever.
Ah. Well, no one ever answered my question: What does KLBC stand for?
...Paul
