[3109] in tlhIngan-Hol
vay'mey vItlhob
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Thu Feb 10 17:22:55 1994
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
From: shoulson@ctr.columbia.edu (Mark E. Shoulson)
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 1994 17:16:47 -0500
In-Reply-To: mark's message of Thu, 10 Feb 94 12:22:11 EST <9402101222.A01442@d
ragonsys.COM>
>From: mark <mark@dragonsys.COM>
>Date: Thu, 10 Feb 94 12:22:11 EST
>ghItlh Marnen (jachqemwI'?):
>> choHlu'laHbe'qu'law'.
>Unfortunately, as has been batted around in here previously, lu'
>and laH can't go together. They're both Type 5, for no evident
>good reason except that that's the way it is. (Languages DO get
>perverse sometimes...) See TKD 4.2.5, para. 1. DoHa'. It makes
>such useful constructions as yours impossible and forces us to
>look for other ways to express the meaning. I rather like
> choHlaHbe'qu'law' nuv
Or maybe "choHlaHlaw' pagh'e'", to avoid confusion about whether you're
talking about a specific nuv...
~mark
