[3035] in tlhIngan-Hol
compound nouns
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Tue Feb 8 10:27:40 1994
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
From: shoulson@ctr.columbia.edu (Mark E. Shoulson)
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 1994 10:23:25 -0500
In-Reply-To: dls9@aol.com's message of Tue, 08 Feb 94 02:09:05 EST <9402080209.
tn258574@aol.com>
jIH neH muja' Guido#1:
>From: dls9@aol.com
>X-Mailer: America Online Mailer
>Date: Tue, 08 Feb 94 02:09:05 EST
>DaghItlhta'
>> bIlughlaw', 'ach chaq pab lubIvbe' no'ma' (chaq "lubIv" Daja'nIS je).
>Isn't an irregular plural noun considered grammatically singular, and just
>plural in meaning? So, then "bIv" without a prefix would be right after all,
>qar'a'?h
qar. bIlugh, 'ej jImuj. DopDaq qul yIchenmoH, QobDI' ghu'.
~mark
