[3009] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: {-moH}
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Mon Feb 7 13:09:55 1994
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Errors-To: tlhIngan-Hol-request@klingon.East.Sun.COM
From: Will Martin <whm2m@uva.pcmail.virginia.edu>
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 94 13:02:08 EST
> -marqoS writes and charghwI' responds:
...
> \Also: how does one say "per" as in "there is one captain per ship"?
> Reword: "neH wa' HoD ghaj Dujmey Hoch", "all of the ships have only
> one captain". There is a potential for confusion here, as it might seem
> that all the ships together have one captain, but we know of no way to say
> "each" or "every".
...
> -marqoS
Good point, though {neH} does not begin a sentence like other
adverbials. It FOLLOWS the word it modifies, be it noun or verb (TKD 5.4,
page 56-57). As for the disambiguity, how about:
Dujmey HochvaD wa' HoD neH ghajtaH wa' Duj
charghwI'
