[2932] in tlhIngan-Hol
tInwI'bID Ha'DIbaH qu' je
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Wed Feb 2 21:31:52 1994
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
From: shoulson@ctr.columbia.edu (Mark E. Shoulson)
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 1994 14:19:49 -0500
In-Reply-To: Nick NICHOLAS's message of Sun, 30 Jan 94 23:55:55 EDT <1994013012
55.13417@krang.vis.mu.OZ.AU>
>From: nsn@vis.mu.OZ.AU (Nick NICHOLAS)
>Date: Sun, 30 Jan 94 23:55:55 EDT
>batlh choja', Mark E. Shoulson quv:
>=>=Ha'DIbaHvam pujlaw' qar'a' tlhob'egh
>=>pujlaw' qar'a' Ha'DIbaHvam
>=No, {pujlaw' Ha'DIbaHvam qar'a'}. See page 179. The tag sentence "qar'a'"
>=follows the previous sentence, it doesn't intervene inside it.
>Um, Mark, I *am* looking at page 179. At the example "De' Sov qar'a' HoD".
>"qar'a'" can follow the verb. qayajHa''a'?
Hmm, so it does. I must have missed that even when I looked it up to
double-check. I guess I'm so used to hearing it the other way.
>=or better, avoid the "-ghach" with "-mo'". Something like "bIlay'pu'mo'
>=yIta'" (or replace "ta'" with an appropriate verb). Think like charghwI'.
>Well, yes, you *could* do that, I suppose... ;)
There are worse methods... :)
~mark
