[2901] in tlhIngan-Hol
syntactic anomaly
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Tue Feb 1 11:32:55 1994
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
From: shoulson@ctr.columbia.edu (Mark E. Shoulson)
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 1994 10:45:09 -0500
In-Reply-To: Mark E. Shoulson's message of Mon, 24 Jan 1994 11:52:39 -0500 <199
401241652.LAA13923@startide.ctr.columbia.edu>
>From: shoulson@ctr.columbia.edu (Mark E. Shoulson)
>Date: Mon, 24 Jan 1994 11:52:39 -0500
>>From: nsn@vis.mu.OZ.AU (Nick NICHOLAS)
>>Date: Sun, 23 Jan 94 12:57:57 EDT
[ discussion about "'e' 'oH tlhobghach'e'" or something ]
Man, the mailer is bizarre. That mail is a solid week old, as was the
thing I saw recently about "qaStaHvIS" from me (which predates the postings
and discussions I wrote about it which you saw first). Strange stuff
happens...
>Maybe "'e' tlhobqu'lu'" would be better (or "yu'qu'lu'"... I forget which
>is which). "'e' SovnISqu'lu'", and so on.
Yeah, I said that... but one minor point I forgot: "net
tlhobqu'/yu'qu'/SovnISqu'" would make it much nicer. "'e' Xlu'", to me, is
something awfully close to "net X".
~mark
