[2052] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: Suffixes (Was: <>vetlh)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Wed Nov 17 17:00:57 1993
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
From: Captain Krankor <krankor@codex.prds.cdx.mot.com>
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 93 14:51:00 -0700
>>I completely agree in principal that rovers should be repeatable within
>>a word, though for this particular example, I would far prefer jIQuchnISqu'.
>>It just seems much more direct, and therefore less likely to start a knife
>>fight.
>You're right, though I said that I'd use {jIQuchbe'laHbe'} (and I would), I
>agree that {jIQuchnISqu'} is *much* more direct and cleaner.
I've lost track; what was the original English?
--Krankor
