[2044] in tlhIngan-Hol
Suffixes (Was: <>vetlh)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Wed Nov 17 09:50:33 1993
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
From: shoulson@ctr.columbia.edu (Mark E. Shoulson)
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.East.Sun.COM>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1993 09:44:03 -0500
In-Reply-To: Will Martin's message of Tue, 16 Nov 93 16:17:51 EST <9311162118.A
A03689@uva.pcmail.Virginia.EDU>
>From: Will Martin <whm2m@uva.pcmail.virginia.edu>
>Date: Tue, 16 Nov 93 16:17:51 EST
>I completely agree in principal that rovers should be repeatable within
>a word, though for this particular example, I would far prefer jIQuchnISqu'.
>It just seems much more direct, and therefore less likely to start a knife
>fight.
You're right, though I said that I'd use {jIQuchbe'laHbe'} (and I would), I
agree that {jIQuchnISqu'} is *much* more direct and cleaner.
>-- charghwI'
~mark
