[1608] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: More on mI'QeD
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Wed Oct 6 09:56:06 1993
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.east.sun.com>
From: Will Martin <whm2m@uva.pcmail.virginia.edu>
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@klingon.east.sun.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 93 09:47:14 EDT
Yo,
I just wanted to state publicly that I fully accept the legitimate
objections to the vI' suffix for fractional inversion. I thought it was a
great idea and I offered my support for it, but even while stating my
support, I acknowledged the low potential for broad acceptance. I respect the
reasons for this rejection. I suggest as a compromise that as Marc assembles
his small additions to the language that he might consider the vI' suffix for
this function.
I think as a group, we can act as a filter for such suggestions, passing
on the ones we consider worthy of consideration to Marc when appropriate,
sparing him the deluge of random suggestions with less driving merit. While I
will not use the vI' suffix until it is officially adopted through the proper
channels, I still offer my support to its consideration by the appropriate
authorities.
-- charghwI'
