[1574] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: tun moQmaj
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Wed Sep 15 16:09:21 1993
Reply-To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
From: "Matthew Whiteacre" <[128.194.3.85]!mmw8970@ima.ima.isc.com>
To: "Klingon Language List" <tlhIngan-Hol@village.boston.ma.us>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 93 14:03:47 CDT
On Wed, 15 Sep 93 12:30:38 EDT, Will Martin wrote:
>
>> baHwI' QaQ wItu'pu'mo' chaq Quj wIQappu'
>
> wItu'pu'mo'?
>
> Verb prefix - verb - verb suffix - NOUN suffix.
>
> I don't think that works.
>
> Maybe wItu'pu'ghachmo'?
>
> Even then, it is an odd construction. I get ridge marks on my desk when
>I try to understand sentences like this...
>
>-- charghwI'
According to the TKD page 175 section 4.2.9 -mo' is a verb suffix identical
to the Type 5 noun suffix -mo'.
____
|INRI|
____| |____
| |
|____ ____|
| | Matt Whiteacre
| | MMW8970@ZEUS.TAMU.EDU
| |
| |
|____|
