[112271] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] when -laH cripples the -lu'

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mayqel qunen'oS)
Tue Mar 19 04:18:40 2019

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmNEH4ronMCjY8E2KxGzMBYvnDaLJnZZFs3W=xX1uxWPQw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "mayqel qunen'oS" <mihkoun@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 10:18:24 +0200
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

--===============8913541384958391734==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dd1b9a05846e26fe"

--000000000000dd1b9a05846e26fe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

De'vID:
> Why wouldn't you just use {vay'}, and then subsequently
> use {ghaH} to refer back to that person?

I'm afraid you misunderstood me.

I don't have a problem with using vay' and then ghaH, as you suggested. It
is what I would naturally do, in order to avoid hitting the -lu'/-laH
problem.

The point of this thread, was to share my disappointment; on one hand we
have a suffix, which we could use in order to refer to someone indefinite,
but on the other hand, the -lu'/-laH rule, undermines our ability to use
-lu' to its fullest, thus limiting its use to expressing passive voice.

Anyway, there are plenty of choices available, so all is good.

~ changan qIj

--000000000000dd1b9a05846e26fe
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto"><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-family:sans-serif;f=
ont-size:12.8px">De&#39;vID:</span></div><span style=3D"font-family:sans-se=
rif;font-size:12.8px">&gt; Why wouldn&#39;t you just use {vay&#39;}, and th=
en subsequently=C2=A0</span><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-family:sa=
ns-serif;font-size:12.8px">&gt; use {ghaH} to refer back to that person?</s=
pan></div><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-family:sans-serif;font-size=
:12.8px"><br></span></div><div dir=3D"auto"><font face=3D"sans-serif"><span=
 style=3D"font-size:12.8px">I&#39;m afraid you misunderstood me.</span></fo=
nt></div><div dir=3D"auto"><font face=3D"sans-serif"><span style=3D"font-si=
ze:12.8px"><br></span></font></div><div dir=3D"auto"><font face=3D"sans-ser=
if"><span style=3D"font-size:12.8px">I don&#39;t have a problem with using =
vay&#39; and then ghaH, as you suggested. It is what I would naturally do, =
in order to avoid hitting the -lu&#39;/-laH problem.</span></font></div><di=
v dir=3D"auto"><font face=3D"sans-serif"><span style=3D"font-size:12.8px"><=
br></span></font></div><div dir=3D"auto"><font face=3D"sans-serif"><span st=
yle=3D"font-size:12.8px">The point of this thread, was to share my disappoi=
ntment; on one hand we have a suffix, which we could use in order to refer =
to someone indefinite, but on the other hand, the -lu&#39;/-laH rule, under=
mines our ability to use -lu&#39; to its fullest, thus limiting its use to =
expressing passive voice.</span></font></div><div dir=3D"auto"><font face=
=3D"sans-serif"><span style=3D"font-size:12.8px"><br></span></font></div><d=
iv dir=3D"auto"><font face=3D"sans-serif"><span style=3D"font-size:12.8px">=
Anyway, there are plenty of choices available, so all is good.</span></font=
></div><div dir=3D"auto"><font face=3D"sans-serif"><span style=3D"font-size=
:12.8px"><br></span></font></div><div dir=3D"auto"><font face=3D"sans-serif=
"><span style=3D"font-size:12.8px">~ changan qIj</span></font></div></div>

--000000000000dd1b9a05846e26fe--

--===============8913541384958391734==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============8913541384958391734==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post