[112190] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] -meH with -pu'/-ta'

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Wed Mar 13 10:31:52 2019

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 10:31:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1jca3d563fc0lae1i637cfu9.1552485218211@email.android.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============4620180818635771321==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------98E90F257A1CF48A963398BF"
Content-Language: en-US

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------98E90F257A1CF48A963398BF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 3/13/2019 10:03 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
>
> There is something which doesn't sit with me so well, in the 
> simultaneous use of -meH with -pu' or -ta'.
>
>
> Lets say I write:
>
>
> {vIghro' tIQ vIje'meH, HuchwIj Hoch vI'anmoHpu'}
>
> In order to buy the ancient cat, I went bankrupt.
>
>
> How would this be any different from writing:
>
>
> {vIghro' tIQ vIje'ta'meH, HuchwIj Hoch vI'anmoHpu'} ?
>
>
> First of all, it sounds weird to say {vIje'ta'meH} "in order that I 
> have bought"; but that aside, is there any reason to use a -pu' or 
> -ta' on the -meH part of the sentence, if I'm to use them in the part 
> of the sentence that comes after the -meH ? Isn't the meaning the same 
> in either case ?
>
*je'meH* isn't just an action, it's a /purpose./ I'm not sure what 
having a completed purpose means. I know what completing having a 
purpose means, but that's something different. I wouldn't put perfective 
here unless I had a very good reason I could articulate.

I'm not sure how *'an* /waste /and *'anmoH*/sacrifice/ are related. 
Shouldn't *Huch vI'an* mean /I waste money?/ And if so, shouldn't *Huch 
vI'anmoH* mean either /I cause money to waste (something)/ or /I cause 
(someone unspecified) to waste money?/

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name


--------------98E90F257A1CF48A963398BF
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/13/2019 10:03 AM, mayqel qunen'oS
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:1jca3d563fc0lae1i637cfu9.1552485218211@email.android.com">
      <p dir="ltr" style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;">There is
        something which doesn't sit with me so well, in the simultaneous
        use of -meH with -pu' or -ta'.</p>
      <br>
      <p dir="ltr" style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;">Lets say I
        write:</p>
      <br>
      <p dir="ltr" style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;">{vIghro' tIQ
        vIje'meH, HuchwIj Hoch vI'anmoHpu'}</p>
      <p dir="ltr" style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;">In order to
        buy the ancient cat, I went bankrupt.</p>
      <br>
      <p dir="ltr" style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;">How would this
        be any different from writing:</p>
      <br>
      <p dir="ltr" style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;">{vIghro' tIQ
        vIje'ta'meH, HuchwIj Hoch vI'anmoHpu'} ?</p>
      <br>
      <p dir="ltr" style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;">First of all,
        it sounds weird to say {vIje'ta'meH} "in order that I have
        bought"; but that aside, is there any reason to use a -pu' or
        -ta' on the -meH part of the sentence, if I'm to use them in the
        part of the sentence that comes after the -meH ? Isn't the
        meaning the same in either case ?</p>
    </blockquote>
    <p><b>je'meH</b> isn't just an action, it's a <i>purpose.</i> I'm
      not sure what having a completed purpose means. I know what
      completing having a purpose means, but that's something different.
      I wouldn't put perfective here unless I had a very good reason I
      could articulate.</p>
    <p>I'm not sure how <b>'an</b> <i>waste </i>and <b>'anmoH</b><i>
        sacrifice</i> are related. Shouldn't <b>Huch vI'an</b> mean <i>I
        waste money?</i> And if so, shouldn't <b>Huch vI'anmoH</b> mean
      either <i>I cause money to waste (something)</i> or <i>I cause
        (someone unspecified) to waste money?</i><br>
    </p>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
  </body>
</html>

--------------98E90F257A1CF48A963398BF--

--===============4620180818635771321==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============4620180818635771321==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post