[112172] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Grammatical gender of a mixed group

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Tue Mar 12 03:02:07 2019

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <35B50CD6-C452-4D5B-BCB7-52484AF7AB34@dadap.net>
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 08:01:51 +0100
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Cc: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

--===============0554383698866478607==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002f0a840583e04469"

--0000000000002f0a840583e04469
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Daniel Dadap <daniel@dadap.net> schrieb am Di., 12. M=C3=A4rz 2019, 03:02:

> Is there any evidence in canon of how a group composed of a mixture of
> speech-capable and non-speech-capable members is treated grammatically? A=
s
> a simple example, if somebody asked you =E2=80=9Cpuqpu' paqmey je Dalegh'=
a'?=E2=80=9D would
> you answer (assuming you see all of them):
>
> a) chaH bIH je vIlegh
> b) chaH vIlegh 'ej bIH vIlegh je
> c) chaH vIlegh
> d) bIH vIlegh
>

{DaH mararchuq / mayIntaHvIS / wa' Dol bIH qa''e' porgh'e' je}
"We are now connected, / Spirit and body are one, / Until our time comes."
(paq'batlh)

Elsewhere, {qa'} is pluralised as {qa'pu'}. But it's in a grey area, in
that it may be that {qa' porgh je} is a set expression.

--=20
De'vID

--0000000000002f0a840583e04469
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto"><div><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" =
class=3D"gmail_attr">Daniel Dadap &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:daniel@dadap.net">d=
aniel@dadap.net</a>&gt; schrieb am Di., 12. M=C3=A4rz 2019, 03:02:<br></div=
><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1=
px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Is there any evidence in canon of how a gro=
up composed of a mixture of speech-capable and non-speech-capable members i=
s treated grammatically? As a simple example, if somebody asked you =E2=80=
=9Cpuqpu&#39; paqmey je Dalegh&#39;a&#39;?=E2=80=9D would you answer (assum=
ing you see all of them):<br>
<br>
a) chaH bIH je vIlegh<br>
b) chaH vIlegh &#39;ej bIH vIlegh je<br>
c) chaH vIlegh<br>
d) bIH vIlegh<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div =
dir=3D"auto">{DaH mararchuq / mayIntaHvIS /=C2=A0wa&#39; Dol bIH qa&#39;&#3=
9;e&#39; porgh&#39;e&#39; je}<br style=3D"">&quot;We are now connected, / S=
pirit=C2=A0and body are one, /=C2=A0Until our time comes.&quot; (paq&#39;ba=
tlh)</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Elsewhere, {qa&#39;=
} is pluralised as {qa&#39;pu&#39;}. But it&#39;s in a grey area, in that i=
t may be that {qa&#39; porgh je} is a set expression.</div><div dir=3D"auto=
"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">--=C2=A0</div><div dir=3D"auto">De&#39;vID</d=
iv></div>

--0000000000002f0a840583e04469--

--===============0554383698866478607==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============0554383698866478607==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post