[112136] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] A long document
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Mon Mar 11 05:21:33 2019
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <ebe991e2-3024-35ad-ef7e-a081675ba072@gmx.de>
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:21:19 +0100
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============1183618758247500913==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000009e7c90583ce19da"
--00000000000009e7c90583ce19da
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 at 09:52, Lieven L. Litaer <levinius@gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 11.03.2019 um 09:45 schrieb mayqel qunen'oS:
> > Without knowing the correct answer (if there is one to start with..), I
> > would choose tIq.
>
> I would also prefer tIq over nI', but it might certainly be possible
> there's another word for that. The word {tIq} makes me think of
> something that is somehow longer than wide, such as a rope or a stick.
>
I think it depends on the specific text. For things which are transcribed
speech, like {bom mu'} or {SoQ ghItlh} or even {lut}, I would use {nI'}.
The word {tIq} seems to describe something physically larger in one
dimension than others. If you told me {tIq paq}, I'd imagine a book with
the dimensions of one of those wine list booklets from a fancy restaurant.
For a {tetlh} or {Qumran}, {tIq} might be appropriate.
(If you use {tIq} for a recipe, it might get confused with the body part.)
--
De'vID
--00000000000009e7c90583ce19da
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
<div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 at 09:52, Lieven =
L. Litaer <<a href=3D"mailto:levinius@gmx.de">levinius@gmx.de</a>> wr=
ote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px=
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Am 11.03.20=
19 um 09:45 schrieb mayqel qunen'oS:<br>
> Without knowing the correct answer (if there is one to start with..), =
I <br>
> would choose tIq.<br>
<br>
I would also prefer tIq over nI', but it might certainly be possible <b=
r>
there's another word for that. The word {tIq} makes me think of <br>
something that is somehow longer than wide, such as a rope or a stick.<br>
</blockquote></div><div><br></div>I think it depends on the specific text. =
For things which are transcribed speech, like {bom mu'} or {SoQ ghItlh}=
or even {lut}, I would use {nI'}. The word {tIq} seems to describe som=
ething physically larger in one dimension than others. If you told me {tIq =
paq}, I'd imagine a book with the dimensions of one of those wine list =
booklets from a fancy restaurant. For a {tetlh} or {Qumran}, {tIq} might be=
appropriate.<div><br></div><div>(If you use {tIq} for a recipe, it might g=
et confused with the body part.)<br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br><di=
v dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature">De'vID</div></div></div>
--00000000000009e7c90583ce19da--
--===============1183618758247500913==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============1183618758247500913==--
