[112122] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Does rIntaH require a sentient being ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Sat Mar 9 01:26:42 2019
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <20190308212011.GA235545@eriophora>
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 07:26:28 +0100
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
--===============1197827988570215353==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000002aaff0583a36c5b"
--00000000000002aaff0583a36c5b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 22:20, <kechpaja@kechpaja.com> wrote:
> While that is what the text would imply, without explicit confirmation
> or contradiction from actual examples, I find myself wanting to default
> to the {vIje' jIH rIntaH} version, the main reason for this being the
> fact that {rIntaH} is marked as having a third person subject. My
> intuition is to treat this construction as essentially a shortening of
> {SENTENCE rIntaH 'e'}.
>
Is that {'e'} supposed to be the *subject* of {rIntaH}? {'e'} can't do that.
The construction is really an emphatic version of {vIje'ta' jIH}. The
{rIntaH} is effectively replacing {-ta'} here.
--
De'vID
--00000000000002aaff0583a36c5b
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
<div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 22:20, <<a h=
ref=3D"mailto:kechpaja@kechpaja.com">kechpaja@kechpaja.com</a>> wrote:<b=
r></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex=
;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">While that is wha=
t the text would imply, without explicit confirmation<br>
or contradiction from actual examples, I find myself wanting to default<br>
to the {vIje' jIH rIntaH} version, the main reason for this being the<b=
r>
fact that {rIntaH} is marked as having a third person subject. My<br>
intuition is to treat this construction as essentially a shortening of<br>
{SENTENCE rIntaH 'e'}. <br>
</blockquote></div><div><br></div>Is that {'e'} supposed to be the =
*subject* of {rIntaH}? {'e'} can't do that.<div><br></div><div>=
The construction is really an emphatic version of {vIje'ta' jIH}. T=
he {rIntaH} is effectively replacing {-ta'} here.=C2=A0<br clear=3D"all=
"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signature">De'v=
ID</div></div></div>
--00000000000002aaff0583a36c5b--
--===============1197827988570215353==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============1197827988570215353==--
