[112082] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] Does Da necessarily require an object ?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Wed Mar 6 11:29:49 2019

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <a69b6ecc-67fc-c88c-f97b-560bbc7a8132@trimboli.name>
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 17:29:33 +0100
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Cc: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

--===============4106099234553176927==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005b733f05836f7ff0"

--0000000000005b733f05836f7ff0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 17:02, SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name> wrote:

> And this is not murky territory in Klingon. It's explained to us, it's
> demonstrated for us, and it's used all the time in canon. It was settled
> before anybody thought to ask the question. The only thing we don't know
> for sure is, are there any verbs that *must* mention an object? I don't
> tend to think so.
>
About a year ago, mayqel asked the same question, but about {rang} (and
{ngI'} was also brought up in the thread).

There are some verbs which, if you used them without an object, would
express a meaning which is weird or not quite right or is missing
something, but that's an issue of semantics, not grammar.

-- 
De'vID

--0000000000005b733f05836f7ff0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
<div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 17:02, SuStel &=
lt;<a href=3D"mailto:sustel@trimboli.name" target=3D"_blank">sustel@trimbol=
i.name</a>&gt; wrote:</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margi=
n:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex=
"><div bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF">
    <p>And this is not murky territory in Klingon. It&#39;s explained to us=
,
      it&#39;s demonstrated for us, and it&#39;s used all the time in canon=
. It
      was settled before anybody thought to ask the question. The only
      thing we don&#39;t know for sure is, are there any verbs that <i>must=
</i>
      mention an object? I don&#39;t tend to think so.</p></div>
</blockquote></div>About a year ago, mayqel asked the same question, but ab=
out {rang} (and {ngI&#39;} was also brought up in the thread).<div><br></di=
v><div>There are some verbs which, if you used them without an object, woul=
d express a meaning which is weird or not quite right or is missing somethi=
ng, but that&#39;s an issue of semantics, not grammar.=C2=A0<br clear=3D"al=
l"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"m_6764842221849978223gma=
il_signature">De&#39;vID</div></div></div>

--0000000000005b733f05836f7ff0--

--===============4106099234553176927==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============4106099234553176927==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post