[112030] in tlhIngan-Hol
[tlhIngan Hol] To -choH, to -'eghmoH, or to nothing ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (mayqel qunen'oS)
Mon Mar 4 09:40:44 2019
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: "mayqel qunen'oS" <mihkoun@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 16:40:29 +0200
To: tlhIngan Hol mailing list <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
In imperatives, sometimes we see in Ca'NoN {-'eghmoH}, and sometimes
we see {-choH}. For example: {yItam'eghmoH} or {yItamchoH}.
I don't know, if there is a Ca'NoN example of using just the verb,
e.g. {yItam}, but regardless whether there is indeed such a case or
not, I wonder..
Should anyone choose whatever he likes ? Is there something of the
three (-'eghmoH, - choH, or none at all), one should necessarily use
in an imperative ?
Or do we just use the Force ?
~ changan qIj
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
